I mentioned, in my last post, how Alrica and I visited OceanĂ¡rio, the aquarium in Lisbon, Portugal. While that was a fun and fascinating experience, it led to some deep thoughts, which were not thoughts of the deep.
Now we are in Bilboa, Spain. I did an bit of exploration on my own this morning and it led to more deep thoughts, different from the first set of deep thoughts. In fact, the two sets are disjoint. (Non-mathematicians, don't worry about it, you'll get it from context.)
Don't misunderstand. I am having a great time seeing the world. But a big part of seeing the world is to broaden your mind. And sometimes as it broadens and swells, it forms eddies, swirling vortices of "huh." Now, I experienced two such vortices this week, and I thought I'd share.
At the OceanĂ¡rio, there was a lot to learn. Many of the panels didn't just talk about the animals or plants, but about the threats posed to them. As you can imagine, a high proportion of those threats are caused by humans. It got me thinking about my career path, my choices.
As a young man, I had a good mind for science. But I didn't choose to go into biology or oceanography or ecology or chemistry. In those fields, one could perhaps deal with major environmental issues like climate change, microplastics, plastics that aren't micro, pollution, or medical breakthroughs. Instead, I went into mathematics. Don't get me wrong, I love mathematics. But mathematics, or at least pure mathematics which is more my side of it, is, to say the least, abstract. Often the things we consider and study have nothing to do with the real world. I shouldn't say that. Maybe in fifty years or three-hundred fifty years someone will take theorems of today, esoteric branches of mathematics of the present, and use them to model phenomena they are studying in the future. That would be great, but honestly, mathematicians would say "Who cares?" Mathematics is studied and expanded, growing in our imagination and our journals, until maybe it reaches the limit of human ingenuity. Or maybe there is no such limit and it can continue to expand indefinitely (or at least until there are no more humans left to appreciate the expansion.)
This thought in my mind is really only a flicker of wonder, a smidgen of doubt, a slight blemish on the unbridled beauty that is a world of abstraction. I don't regret what I've done with my career. I've always worked in educational settings: science museums and universities. I'm helping to pass knowledge on to future generations with the hope that one day some of them will surpass me. I'm sure many will. I'm sure many have already.
So maybe I'm not solving these crises of the world. This isn't to say it was my task to do so, but if I had been capable, should I have made it my task? Maybe, indirectly, I did. Maybe one day someone who learned to love science a bit more because of my work in a museum, or someone who learned a new mathematical skill because of a class I taught, will be part of a team that does address these major issues. And then I played a part, right?
And if that doesn't happen, no student of mine ever works on any of these problems our society faces, I still opened up the potential for it to happen. I guess, for me, that is going to have to count as enough.
That was the deep thought of two days hence. For the deep thought of today, let me tell you about one of my destinations in my ramble. I walked to the Old Town of Bilbao. From there, one can go up to the Basilica de Begoña. When I say up, I literally mean up. You start at the bottom of a long stone staircase. Each set of stairs is only seven or eight steps, but there are dozens of these sets. I looked it up, it's a total of 311 steps.
 |
The start of what would be a long journey |
It was actually quite interesting, because there are apartment buildings that have their door along this rising slope. Some people have to walk some portion of these steps everyday just to come home or leave home. (I suppose both.)
 |
The Basilica from the front |
I reached the Basilica de Begoña. It is a pretty building, and I walked around it, seeing it from all its sides. Then I went inside. I didn't take pictures inside, this is a place of worship, and that felt disrespectful. I sat in one of the pews and looked at the detailed stone work of the ceiling, the many paintings depicting religious scenes, and the colored windows. That's when the deep thoughts started.
All of this splendor must have cost quite a sum of money: the architecture, the materials, the art. And it must cost a lot of money to maintain. Mind you, the Basilica de Begoña was hardly the most decorated or ostentatious place of worship I've seen of late. You can look back at my post about St. Sava in Belgrade or way back to when, while traveling with the kids, we visited the Vatican. There is so much money tied up in these buildings. These churches represent a huge investment. And all of that money isn't going to educate the ignorant, to improve the prospects of the poor, to find cures for the sick, or to combat the hatred of the intolerant. It's going into a building, into things.
I'm personally in favor of art. I think artists provide a wonderful service to society and they should be paid for their work. But if that work is going to be cloistered away, hidden from the eyes of most people, then doesn't it lose its true value? (This, by the way, got me thinking about another thought. You know how writing is protected by copyright, but eventually it goes into the public domain. Why can't visual arts do the same? If an artist makes a work and a collector, or the church, wants to buy it, great. The artist makes a living and the collector has a new treasure. But after some period, some time after the purchaser dies or the artist dies or just so many years after the completion of the work, it becomes public. It goes to a museum, somewhere that the people can see it. And it goes to the museum for free, or maybe the museum pays for shipping. But the point is that because the art comes for free, it is also put on display for free. Even the indigent can go see amazing, beautiful works because they belong to the people.)
That was a tangent. (Or maybe a secant as it wasn't entirely tangential, but again, for the non-mathematicians, just ignore this parenthetical statement.) My main point is that maybe religious organizations should spend less on the houses of worship and more on the missions espoused by their scriptures and teachings. I'm sure expensive architecture and art can heighten the spirituality of the moment. But if parishioners can't get into a worshipful frame of mind without a 20,000 dollar painting hanging at the side of the room, maybe the problem is the piety and not the property.
I don't mean to call out the Catholic Church as the primary offender on this front. Though, once you've seen the troves of Roman artifacts, statuary, and gold at the Vatican, you realize they probably are the primary offender. Still, they are not the only offender. I've visited churches, synagogues, mosques, Hindu temples, and Buddhist wats that must have cost eye raising sums to raise in some impressive and barely accessible locations, to then be stuffed with a unfair plethora of decoration, ornamentation, and the good stuff.
I also recognize that me, Erich, calling this out is, not hypocritical, but maybe... I can't find a single word for it, but I mean this: I'm an outsider in this society of religions, not part of the community being served. I don't believe in any supernatural beings, and when, as a child, I accepted the existence of some divinity merely on the word of an older generation without any evidence or critical thinking on my part, that divinity was not Christ. I'm saying, as an outsider, maybe I will never, at a guttural level, understand why an ostentatious display of wealth is necessary to commune with the divine. Maybe it is needed by true believers, their prayers may seem meaningless without shimmering golden cups on the altar. I don't know, and I'm never going to experience that particular emotion or sensation.
Or maybe an outsider is exactly who can ask the question. Someone who can say to the believers, "Why?" Why is such expenditure needed for the building where you pray? Why can't that same money be spent in the community, doing the work that your prophets called upon you to do? Maybe an insider is so inured into the culture of their church, so inside, that it just seems natural. They don't question it because that's how it has always been.
Either way, I am the one asking the question. I don't expect an answer. But I would like other people to think about it, or at least ask the question along with me.
I know, we're already asking ourselves so many meaningful, unanswerable questions. Can we really handle one more? Or is it just a drop in that proverbial deep thought ocean?