But there are some uses of “the” in
which it is no longer a minor piece of a noun puzzle. It is as
powerful any mighty
adjective. And when this occurs, it is usually one of two possible
meanings.
First, there are some elements of
society, geography, or nature that are so unique, so dominant, and so
apparently set apart from all other elements of that sort, that they
obtain a “the” which is to say “the one” or “the
incomparable”. As an example, when I lived in New Jersey, people
would often refer to “the city.” In every context in which this
occurred, it was apparent to all exactly which city was indicated.
Because New York City surpassed all others in size, cultural
opportunities, diversity, and economics. Only one city could be “the
city”, at least in that area. I'm not saying that NYC's “the-ness”
is a global phenomenon. I would imagine that in France “le ville”
indicates Paris far more than New York, in England “the city”
would likely be London, and in Lichtenstein saying “the city”
would just be pretentious.
Second, we can use “the” to
indicate not one specific shining example, but something more
widespread. It has great breadth, not height. It touches on many,
many lives, but cannot be isolated. An example: “the man”. You
have probably heard people say they must stand up to “the man” or
earn their pay by working for “the man” or complain about being
held back by “the man.”
Side story: Once, when my wife and I
were going into “the city” as mentioned above with another
couple, it was agreed that we should see a movie that was not made by
“the man.” My friend suggested “The Man Who Wasn't There”
because with that kind of title, how it could it fail to satisfy a
prohibition on “the man?” But his wife declined that suggestion.
We ended up seeing Amélie
(which was a new movie then, so you get an idea of when this
occurred) which I loved but my three companions all found
unpalatable.
Back to my point. When we use “the”
in this context, we aren't talking about one specific man, nor one
exemplary man. We are talking about a pervasive and, in this case,
nefarious element of society. Though nefariousness or nefariosity is
not required. What is required is that broadness, that being present
at multiple levels of existence.
I now wish to use “the” to fuse
both of those meanings together at once. I want to talk about “the
theater.”
“The theater” is normally a usage
implying pervasiveness without specificity. It refers to an art form
that is thousands of years old. It refers to a community of actors,
writers, directors, technicians, designers, producers, crew, and
generally innovative people who keep this ever dying art form alive.
I am proud to be a part of “the theater” in several of those
roles. It is a powerful form of communication that benefits from
being live, from connecting audiences to words, actions, and stories.
But a few days ago, I, along with my
family, went to “the theater.” And here, I mean “the theater”
as one specific, overarching, incomparable, paragon to which all that
comes after is trying to match theater. We visited “the theater”
of Dionysus, or the Dionysia.
No longer are shows being produced
here. It is not a bigger theater than all others, nor would I imagine
its stone seats surpass other theaters in levels of comfort. (Though
I have been in a few theaters in my time that convince me that these
stone seats provide more comfort than some.) It doesn't have stage
machinery to dazzle one's senses. It doesn't even have lights. But it
is “the theater.”
Because here, in Athens, is where this
infant art form thrived and blossomed at least through its toddler
and school years. Comedy and tragedy came about as part of an annual
tradition/competition called The Lenaia. This festival was a worship
of Dionysus Lenaios, God of Wine. Though in its earliest days it
probably took place in another location, by around 450 BCE already
its performances had moved to The Dionysia.
Being there inspired awe. Western
culture as we know it spawned in Athens. This place, this festival,
this was primordial, and our television shows, movies, plays,
ballets, operas, musicals, and popular songs are all children of The
Lenaia.
While I sat, thinking that my butt
might be on a marble slab that Aristophanes' butt once graced, I felt
connected to a sweeping movement. We are so shaped by stories we
hear. We are so influenced by art we consume. And we can trace so
much of it back to this one place.
I don't want to overgeneralize. There
are many stories from other cultures that did not come from the
Dionysia. I do not mean to dismiss any of these either. But without
“the theater,” that movement that began in this particular “the
theater” I wonder what our society's art would look like today. It
would be fun to write a story about such a world, but how could I do
so without being influenced in my telling of it by Dionysus and story
telling that spawned in his theater and that I have been fed all my
life?
Though if I ever find a way to write
that tale, I will be sure to write it as a play. Because this is a
type of story that belongs in “the theater.”
No comments:
Post a Comment