Often, though not always, people have a
terrible understanding of what is and is not probable. I should
probably state the probability that a randomly chosen person will
have a terrible understanding of how probable an occurrence is. But
then again, that is layering the probabilities, and will most likely
only confuse people further.
Let me give you some examples of what I
mean.
I was in a faculty meeting at an
institution where I worked. We had a visitor from learning support
speaking to us. The incoming students had taken placement exams in
writing and mathematics. And this speaker was talking about the
results.
“What percentage of the students do
you think scored below average on both tests?” the speaker asked.
One of the faculty guessed “Twenty-five
percent.” And he was exactly right. Then she went on and on
bemoaning this fact, saying we had to better support those students.
I raised my hand and asked, “When you
say they scored below average, you mean the national average on these
tests or just at our institution?”
“Just at our institution.”
And then I was perplexed. On any set of
test scores, the median is the score for which half the students did
better and half the students did worse. The average, or the mean, may
not be the same as the median, but for most sets of data, they're
close to each other. So you would expect about half of the students
on one test to score below average.
If there are two tests, making no other
assumptions about any connections between the scores on the two
tests, you would expect about a quarter of the students to score
below average on both tests. Why? Because one quarter is one half
times one half.
So 25% was exactly the number one
should have expected. Why was our speaker going on and on about how
terrible this was? I more or less asked this question and got an
unsatisfactory answer. Our speaker didn't understand my objection.
The curse of thinking mathematically, I guess. At least when others
don't.
There are plenty of other examples in
society. We concern ourselves with incredibly improbable things while
ignoring probable things that just don't seem as catastrophic to us.
Some people insist they must be allowed to have guns in the home for
protection against home invasion. It sounds reasonable, home
invasions would be terrible. But probabilities don't really bear it
out. In fact, the probability of being a victim of a home invasion is
much smaller than the probability of a death or injury occurring
caused by a gun kept in the home.
Still, sometimes we recognize the
improbable for what it is, especially when it is improbable with a
positive outcome. These things we call miracles.
We learned about a miracle baby on the
Island of Penang in Malaysia.
On December 26, 2004, there was a
tsunami, as I'm sure many remember. Penang was one of the places hit
by that tsunami. And most of the people on the island had no idea it
was coming until the waters hit.
This includes a couple who were working
at a beachside restaurant. They had brought their baby with them to
work and she was laying out on the beach on a mattress. This was just
a tiny baby, not old enough to roll off the mattress or crawl away. I
know, this sounds like a tragedy in the making, but it's not.
Remember, miracle baby.
Yes, the waters rose and somehow,
miraculously lifted the mattress up rather than flinging it for
miles. And then, just as miraculously, when the waters withdrew
again, they set the mattress back down on the beach. The baby was
still there, perhaps jostled a bit, but unharmed. Her parents grabbed
her and got away.
I wasn't there, so I can't say how it
happened. I was only hearing the tale told now, years later. But this
girl is called, by the people of Penang, the Miracle Baby. Every year
on December 27th, the local newspaper publishes her picture as a baby
and her picture at whatever age she is. They tell how she has grown
over the past year and give the readers an account of her life.
What would that be like? This girl is
local celebrity, she's famous among the people of Penang. And she has
been since before she can remember. She won her fame through an act
of nature that she had nothing to do with and has no personal memory
of it. Do you think it's great? Or do you think it's tons of
pressure? Or is it basically like being anyone else, except once a
year newspaper reporters come to question you and get your picture?
I don't know. We should calculate the
probabilities of each possible outcome.
Nah, why bother? Most people wouldn't
understand it anyway.
No comments:
Post a Comment